Casey Griswold at BlueSnap argues that modernising Accounts Receivable (AR) isn’t an efficiency project but an act of cost recovery

Most businesses carefully track their operating expenses, from payroll to supplier spend. Yet a major source of unnecessary cost often goes unmeasured: accounts receivable (AR).
Manual processes, disconnected systems and inconsistent payment methods add friction to collections, extending payment cycles and tying up working capital that could be put to better use elsewhere. Because these costs are spread thinly across so many everyday activities, leadership teams rarely measure their cumulative impact, so they treat them as the cost of doing business rather than recognising them as a drag on cash flow and profitability.
The right way to think about this isn’t efficiency; it’s cost recovery. Money the business has already earned or already spent that’s sitting unclaimed in day-to-day operations. This becomes even more important for businesses managing international payments, multiple currencies or diverse customer payment preferences.
Big Truck Rental (BTR) processes over 800 invoices a month, relying on manual work to reconcile invoices over email, chase individual customers and process cheques sent by post.
When they stopped to tally the impact, they found nearly 2,000 labour hours a year consumed by manual collections, reconciliation and follow-up, roughly one full-time employee’s annual workload spent on tasks that shouldn’t require a person at all. On top of that, they were spending close to $400,000 on credit card fees because they weren’t taking advantage of surcharging.
These are direct financial costs, and fixing AR is a fundamental step in preventing that loss of money.
Framing AR modernisation solely around efficiency gains, doing the same things faster with fewer people, tends to put it in the operations or technology budget, competing for funding with everything else. That framing undersells the opportunity: every invoice you issue is essentially an interest-free loan to your customer. And carrying those loans comes with a cost.
The hours spent manually chasing invoices are hours the business has already paid for. The credit card fees quietly flowing through the P&L are real money leaving the business right now. Framed as an efficiency play, AR modernisation reads as just another operational improvement project. Framed as cost recovery, it sits alongside margin protection, working capital and cash flow visibility, issues that are firmly on the CFO’s agenda.
The inefficiencies of manual AR are threefold, and they compound at every stage of the payment cycle.
Start with what it takes to send the right message to the right customer. Most businesses don’t treat all accounts in the same way, nor should they. Large accounts differ from small ones, auto-pay customers from those on terms. Every invoice carries a quiet decision about who the customer is and how they expect to be approached.
Payment reminders multiply the problem. Before an AR rep can send a follow-up, they first have to reconstruct what happened last: was the invoice delivered, was payment promised, is there a dispute in play? That reconstruction happens invoice by invoice, customer by customer, every cycle, and none of it shows up as a line item. It’s simply absorbed as “the way AR works.”
Delivery itself is often a technology problem rather than a manual one. Many AR and invoicing platforms send payment requests from their own domain, not the business’s. Requests from an unrecognised address don’t get paid promptly as they’re often ignored, caught by spam filters, or prompt a call to verify legitimacy, delaying collection and pulling team members into conversations that eat up valuable hours.
Reconciliation carries similar problems. When customer payments don’t automatically feed back into the ERP or when payment data is spread across multiple payment providers or systems, someone has to match them manually. For businesses running hundreds of transactions a month, that’s hours of work every week spent replicating what an integrated system would do without being asked.
Then there’s the cost of accepting payment itself. Card fees on B2B transactions are expensive, especially across global markets. Many businesses respond by limiting card acceptance or steering customers toward wires and cheques instead. That reduces fees, but it isn’t free: wires and cheques are slower to reconcile, and the largest invoices are often precisely the ones customers want to put on a card to protect their own cash flow. Restricting acceptance doesn’t remove the cost; it converts it into delay, reconciliation work and customer friction, matching the right payment method to the right customer, at the right cost.
Modernising AR rarely requires a major transformation or system overhaul. Most AR inefficiencies come from legacy processes that create unnecessary manual work and hidden costs. In most cases, targeted improvements to existing ERP systems can deliver noticeable results within weeks.
The core focus of a modern AR approach is to remove friction across the payment cycle using:
The same platform also changes the economics of accepting cards. Compliant surcharging offsets processing costs where appropriate, and passing enhanced transaction data (Level 2/3, and CEDP for Visa commercial cards) qualifies B2B transactions for lower interchange rates. Customers keep the payment flexibility they want on their largest invoices, and the business stops absorbing the full cost.
For finance leaders under pressure to protect margins, improve cash visibility, and do more with existing headcount, AR automation addresses all three. According to a 2025 IDC study, organisations adopting modern AR platforms see finance team productivity rise by up to 50%, with a three-year ROI of 391% and a payback period of around seven months. Skilled professionals can stop spending time chasing payments and reconciling spreadsheets and start focusing on work that actually moves the business forward.
The cost of broken AR is already being incurred. It’s sitting in your P&L, absorbed into day-to-day operations and accepted as normal, whether you’re collecting domestic invoices or managing international payments. The only question is whether your business is ready to stop paying it.
Casey Griswold is GM of Invoicing and Billing, BlueSnap, Powered by Payroc
Main image courtesy of iStockPhoto.com and MicroStockHub
Winston House, 3rd Floor,
Units 306-309, 2-4 Dollis park,
London, N3 1HF
020 8349 4363
© 2026, Lyonsdown Limited. teiss® is a registered trademark of Lyonsdown Ltd. VAT registration number: 830519543